|             
 How to Determine 
        Production Methods Press molded ceramics were 
        formed by pressing sheets of clay into molds. Separate pieces of the mold 
        were then connected and the seams in the clay joined and smoothed.  Slip casting was made when 
        a liquid clay slip was poured into the plaster mold. After the clay closest 
        to the mold had dried, the excess liquid slip was poured away. The dried 
        clay pieces were removed from the molds, trimmed and joined to form vessels. 
       To easily tell the difference in vessels created by these 
        two manufacturing techniques, look at the vessel interior. A press molded 
        ceramic will have a smooth or relatively smooth interior, while the interior 
        of a slip cast vessel will follow the relief design on the exterior.   The jug shown at left depicts the Tam O’Shanter pattern, 
        based on a famous poem by Scottish poet Robert Burns. Impressed in the 
        base of the jug are the words “Published by W. Ridgway & Co., 
        Hanley, October 1st, 1835”. The designs on the jug were based on 
        a series of engravings by Thomas Landseer for the 1830 edition of Tam 
        O’Shanter (Henrywood 1984:66). This jug, whose shape is characteristic 
        of the earliest press molded jugs, was recovered from 18BC27, the site 
        of the Federal Reserve Bank in Baltimore. It had been deposited in a circular 
        brick-lined privy along with a number of other ceramic and glass vessels 
        that suggested the privy had been filled sometime between 1835 and 1870.
     
  
        Back           
   | 
   
    | 
  
    Decorative Motifs on Molded Jugs | 
   
    |                         1830s and 1840s – Representative of Hunting 
        and tavern scenes and mythological themes in deeply molded relief. Often the lips and handles are elaborately molded to represent human faces, 
        dogs or other animals, or plants.
 | 
   
    | 
 
   Fox and Hounds, c. 1831 (Minton)
 (private collection)
   |  
             Boar and Stag Hunt, c. 1845 (Masons)
 (private collection)
 | 
   
    | 
 
  Robert Burns, c.1834 (Machin & Potts)
 (private collection)
   
  Jousting Jug, A William Ridgway, Son & Co.
 7.5in (19cm) high.
  (private collection)    
         
          Back |   Medieval Revelry (Minton & Co.)
 Pattern registered 7-23-1852
 (private collection)
 
 
 
 
  Souter Johnnie jug, in buff stoneware.
 c. 1830-50, 9.75in (24.6cm) high.
 (private collection)       | 
   
    |     
             
             
             
     1840s and 1850s – Putti or cherubs.
        
       | 
   
    | 
  c.1831-35 Minton Putti
 (private collection)
 
    (Private Collection)
      
         
            Back 
                |  Dancing Amorini, 1845 (Minton).
 Registered March 20, 1845
 (private collection)
   
 
  
 Dancing Putti
 (Private Collection)
 | 
   
    |             
     1840s and 1850s – Pattern typical of Genre scenes, including 
  countryside activities such as harvesting crops, making wine or sleeping children.
 | 
   
    |  
  Babes in the Woods - c. 1845
 (Samual Alcock & Co.)
 (private collection)
  Babes in the Woods - c. 1845
 (Samual Alcock & Co.)
 (private collection)
     
        Back | 
 
  Gipsey, 1842
 (Jones and Walley)
 (private collection)
         | 
   
    |         
     1840s 
        – Religious themes began to appear. | 
   
    |     Minster, 1846 and Apostle, 1842
 (both by 
        Charles Meigh)
 (private collection)
      Infant Samuel 1848
 (T & R Boote)
 (private collection)
     
         
          Back | 
   
    |         
         Late 1860s – Geometric and Greek Revival 
      designs begin to appear. 
 
 | 
  
    | 
 Teapot in a yellow paste stoneware with  molded grape motif.  Smear glazed  exterior and clear lead glazed interior.
 Hanley - Collected by George L. Miller in 1986 in Hanley.  Produced by Ridgway & Abington.
   | 
  
    | 
  1860s Greek Key design
 (W.B. Cobridge)
 (private collection)
 |  (private collection)
 | 
   
    |    (private collection)
      
        Back 
          
                    |  
       
 
  (private collection)
 | 
   
    | 
   
 
         Floral 
        Pattern Motif Examples   1830s-1840s—Running Plants. The earliest 
        plant designs were those whose branches, leaves and flowers were irregularly scattered across the vessel.
 | 
   
    |    Convolvulus, 1848
 (W. T. Copeland)
 (private collection)
   
        Back       |  
                  Fuschia -1857
 (Ridgway & Abington)
 (private collection)
      
          
   | 
   
    |       
       Late 1840s—Growing Plants. Plants took on a more realistic 
        growth pattern, springing vertically up the sides of the jug from the base.
   | 
   
    |  Bullrushes, 1848
 (Ridgway & Abingdon)
 (private collection)
      Bullrushes Maker's mark.
 Exterior smear glaze and clear lead glaze interior.
 Registered  by Ridgway & Abington on March 7, 1848.
 Hanley - 
collected  by  George L. Miller in 1986 in Hanley.
      
        Back  
             |  
           c.1850 Victorian Harvest Jug
 (private collection)
   
   | 
   
    |   
     1840s to the 1860s—Naturalistic 
        Forms. Plants depicted in great detail began to appear, often shown against an appropriate background; for example, in Mayer’s 
        Convolvulus pattern,
 the jug is molded to represent a tree stump, against which morning glories 
      grow.
 | 
   
    |      Mayer’s Convolvulus pattern
 (private collection)
 
     1850 - Dudson
 (private collection)
    (private collection)
    1853 Niagara Falls Cascade
 (private collection)
       Back             |      Mayer’s Convolvulus pattern
 (private collection)
    1850 - Dudson
 (private collection)
     (private collection)
   | 
   
    |           
      
            
        1860s-1870s—General Floral. Price competition led to 
            simpler design and manufacturing standards. Stylized floral patterns, often in conjunction
 with geometric designs, began to appear.
 | 
   
    |    Gothic Ivy - 1856
 (William Brownfield)
 (private collection)
       
        Back |     
             
       
 
 
 
  Dudson Brothers - c. 1898
    
          
 
          
       | 
   
    |           
      
        Beginning in the mid-1870s – Japanese-influenced 
          designs of random shapes and sprays of foliage and flowers, such as 
          cherry or prunus blossoms.
   
 Japanese Sprays - 1877(Pinder, Bourne & 
        Co.)
 
 (private collection)
    
         
          Back     | 
  
    | HanleyCollected  by George L. Miller in 1986 in Hanley
 
 Fluted teapot in a greyish green pasted  stoneware with smear glaze on exterior and glazed interior.
 Cannot be attributed to a particular  manufacturer. | Private Collection 
 The teapot fragment on left appears to be very  similar to the small teapot pictured here. This vessel, standing 3.5” tall, was  described as a “one cup” teapot, circa 1830.   Note the metal handle attached to replace a broken ceramic handle. http://andrewbaseman.com/blog/?tag=stoneware&paged=2 | 
   
    | 
   
 
 General 
        Vessel Shapes | 
   
    | 
 Vessels are shown without molding for clarity.
     
  
         
           
             
               
               Figure - a                                                                      
                     Figure - b
 1830s-1840s— Bulbous Form. A bulbous, low-weighted 
                  body was widely used (Figure –a), becoming more slender 
                  (Figure –b) in the later 1840s. Generally round in cross-section, 
                  these bulbous jugs had pronounced pedestal feet, flaring lips 
                  and high, molded handles. Smaller foot rings and lower, less 
                  flaring lips appeared in conjunction with the more slender jugs 
                  of the late 1840s.
  
          
           
            Back             | 
   
    | 
       
       Vessels are shown without molding 
        for clarity 
  
         
           
             
               
                 
                  1830s onward—Modified Dutch 
                    Jug. Vessels with their center of gravity rising towards the 
                    shoulder were present throughout the entire production period, 
                    with a brief increase in the number of registered vessels 
                    in the late 1840s and early 1850s. Vessel generally displayed 
                    small foot rims and lower, less flaring lips. 
    
         
          Back 
                  | 
   
    |     
             
       
             
     
       Vessels are shown without molding 
          for clarity      
         
           
             
               
                 
                  Beginning in late 1840s—Tankard Form. Characterized 
                    by a flat base with simple, straight sides tapering towards 
                    the top of the vessel. Tankard-shaped jugs initially continued 
                    the use of upward flaring spouts, later replaced by flat rims.
 
       
        
          Back         | 
   
    |     
             
             
             
             
             
       Vessels are shown without molding for clarity 
 
        
           
             
               
                 
                  Mid to late 1850s onward—Baluster Form. Beginning 
                    around 1850, but increasing later that decade, potters adopted 
                    a shape characterized by a spherical lower body on a small 
                    footring, tapering continuously to a flaring spout.       
       
       
        
          Back      
         
          
         | 
   
    |     
             
             
             
             
             
       
        
            
   Back |